This is creating a lot of buzz…and a lot of it isn’t supportive. Steven Spielberg plans to remake the classic 1950 movie, Harvey, which starred Jimmy Stewart and Josephine Hull.

The questions buzzing out there are, “Who could possibly hope to replace Jimmy Stewart in this role” and “Who would even dare to try?”
Film lovers are understandably nervous. It IS somewhat reassuring that the project’s going to be in the hands of Spielberg, who is one of the best filmmakers of this generation, and has a proven track record. I’d feel even better if it were in Peter Jackson’s or Tim Burton’s hands, but I would settle for Spielberg without too many reservations.
Besides the obvious casting questions (and Hull’s not going to be easy to recast, either–her role is almost as iconic as Stewart’s), the anxiety also seems to center around questions of updating. Can you update Harvey and still have it be Harvey? Will there be sex, CGI, or action sequences? (I am squeezing my eyes shut, crossing my fingers, and whispering, “please, please please, don’t let Spielberg put those things in.”)
For those of you who don’t know the story (because you apparently grew up at sea with no satellite), it centers on a middle-aged man named Elwood P. Dowd (“here’s my card…”). Elwood is charming and social, drinks constantly, and has a true love of his fellow human beings. He’s liked wherever he goes. His sister, Vera, however, is embarassed by him, because Elwood’s constant companion is a 6 foot tall invisible white rabbit named Harvey. The play centers around the “sane” people’s dilemma of what to do about Elwood and his “delusions.” Elwood’s character is innocent and open, and the whole film rests on the fact that he sure doesn’t seem delusional.
In the film community, the consensus seems to be, “Just leave it the heck alone, but if you can’t, you’d better do it right!”
I completely agree with that, leaning more toward “leave it the heck alone.” Can’t some things just stand as they are? Does everything have to be “fixed,” “improved,” “remade?” Do we even have the capability of doing justice to Elwood P. Dowd anymore?

Image Courtesy of 353 Reviews
But, okay, say that Spielberg loves this story and these characters as much as the rest of us do. It’s possible. So, he has to start casting it.
The pivotal question is, who could play Elwood P. Dowd? Other roles matter, too, such as his sister, Vera and his niece, Myrtle Mae. But I want to know what you think about Elwood most of all.
I can only think of one actor at the moment who could oull it off. Well, actually, two.. but hear me out before you freak out, okay?
One is Steve Carell. He’s funny, but he’s a GREAT actor when he’s allowed to play it straight. Think of Dan in Real Life. He was funny but not slapstick, poignant, desperate, deep, hopeful, and slightly pathetic. He even brings a lot of that pathos to his role as Michael Scott in The Office, who anyone else would make us hate, but in Carell’s hands, we actually kind of like him even as we pity him. Carrell could do it.
The other one (we’re not freaking out, remember?) that I think could do it is Jim Carrey. Again, when he’s not constrained by this stupid box Hollywood has put him in, he’s a very good actor. Think of The Man in the Moon. Let him play it straight, and he’s got depth and charm there.
I can’t think of any other possibilities that are the right age. It has to be someone who can do both comedy and depth–those actors are a rare breed. I can think of a few older men who can do it–like Anthony Hopkins or Chris Cooper–but they’re too old. John Travolta was in talks for it a while back, but that expired, and he’s not going to get it…thank GOD! WIlliam H. Macy would be okay, but he’s too old. Not that that will stop Hollywood.
So, who do you think? Give me some ideas!